Skip to content

Frontier AI Model Comparison

Quick reference matrix comparing the major models as of April 2026.


Overall Feature Comparison

Feature GPT-5.4 Gemini 3.1 Claude 4.6 Llama 4
Release Mar 2026 Feb 2026 Feb 2026 2026 Q1
Status Active Active Active Active
Cost Tier Premium Premium Premium Free (open)
Modalities Text, Code Text, Image, Audio, Video Text Text, Image, Video
Context Window Standard 1M (→2M) Standard 400K-10M
Thinking Model Yes (separate) Native Yes (separate) No
Open Source

Architecture Comparison

Aspect GPT-5.4 Gemini 3.1 Claude 4.6 Llama 4
Design Focus Agentic + coding Thinking + multimodal Reasoning + safety Efficiency + open
Multimodal Text/code native Early-fusion (native) Text-primary Early-fusion (native)
Parameter Efficiency Standard Standard Standard MoE (17B active)
Specialized Variants Mini, Nano, Spark Nano Banana 2 Mythos (security) Scout, Maverick

Performance Benchmarks

Computer Use / Agentic Tasks

Model Benchmark Score Notes
GPT-5.4 Standard OSWorld 75% Near-human reliability
GPT-5.4 Mini SWE-bench Pro 54.38% 6x cheaper, near-parity with Standard
Gemini 3.1 Pro AIME 2025 95.6% Math reasoning leader
Claude 4.6 Opus Code eval 97% Strong reasoning
Llama 4 Open-weight Baseline Efficiency-focused

Intelligence Index

Rank Model Score Date
#1 Gemini 3.1 Pro 57 Apr 2026
#2 GPT-5.4 Standard 56.8 Apr 2026
#3 Claude 4.6 Opus 56.5 Apr 2026
#4 Llama 4 Maverick 54.2 Apr 2026

Context Window Comparison

Model Context Practical Use
Gemini 3.1 Pro 1M tokens (2M planned) Full code repositories, 45min video
Llama 4 Maverick 10M tokens Massive document ingestion
Llama 4 Scout 400K tokens Large documents, multiple files
GPT-5.4 ~128K tokens Standard multi-file projects
Claude 4.6 ~200K tokens Large codebase context

Pricing & Cost-Effectiveness

API Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Model Input Output Use Case
GPT-5.4 Standard $2.50 $15.00 General purpose
GPT-5.4 Mini $0.15 $0.60 Cost-optimized (95% performance)
Gemini 3.1 Pro $3.50 $14.00 Reasoning/multimodal
Claude 4.6 Sonnet $3.00 $15.00 Balanced
Llama 4 $0.00 $0.00 Open-source (self-hosted)

Cost-Performance Ratio

Best value: GPT-5.4 Mini - 54.38% SWE-bench (vs Standard 57.7%) - 6x cheaper - 94% performance, 17% cost

Best reasoning: Gemini 3.1 Pro - AIME: 95.6% - Native thinking - Full multimodal

Best for scale: Llama 4 Maverick - 10M context - Free/open-source - GPU-efficient (single H100)


Modality Support

Model Text Image Audio Video
GPT-5.4
Gemini 3.1
Claude 4.6
Llama 4

When to Use Each Model

Choose GPT-5.4 when:

  • You need agentic capabilities (desktop/web automation)
  • Coding is a primary task
  • Cost efficiency matters (use Mini variant)
  • You need fast inference

Choose Gemini 3.1 when:

  • Video/audio understanding is required
  • You need the highest intelligence score
  • Extremely long context (1M+ tokens)
  • Multimodal reasoning is central

Choose Claude 4.6 when:

  • You need strong reasoning/analysis
  • Security/safety is paramount
  • You require specialized variants (Mythos for red-teaming)
  • Balanced performance across tasks

Choose Llama 4 when:

  • Cost/hosting is critical (open-source)
  • Privacy requires on-prem deployment
  • You can fine-tune for specific domain
  • You have GPU infrastructure

Model Lifecycle Status

Active (April 2026)

  • GPT-5.4 (all variants)
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro
  • Claude 4.6 (Opus, Sonnet, Haiku)
  • Llama 4 (Scout, Maverick)

Retiring Soon

  • GPT-5.2 (retiring June 5, 2026)
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro (deprecated March 2026)
  • Claude 3.7 Sonnet (previous generation)

Deprecated

  • GPT-4.5 / earlier
  • Gemini 3.0 / earlier
  • Claude 3.5 / earlier

Decision Matrix

Need multimodal? → Gemini 3.1
   ↓ No
Need agentic? → GPT-5.4
   ↓ No
Need reasoning? → Claude 4.6
   ↓ No
Need open-source? → Llama 4
   ↓ No
→ Default: GPT-5.4 Standard

Last Updated

April 8, 2026